Chen Lu

Lynn Hershman Leeson : her name is an “anti-body”

林恩·赫舍曼·利森:她的名字是一剂抗体

In The Art Newspaper China’s “Art & Tech” column, Lu Chen interviews pioneering media artist Lynn Hershman Leeson. From early interactive works to AI, DNA storage, and the installation Infinity Engine, her practice probes identity, surveillance, and biotechnology—while insisting on optimism amid invisible risks.

Lynn Hershman
Lynn Hershman Leeson holding the custom “LYNN HERSHMAN” antibody. © Laurids Jensen
Publication Originally published on The Art Newspaper China (Issue 61, 2018). Read full article (PDF) ↗ Web Read ↗

Editor’s note

编辑说明

This article situates Lynn Hershman Leeson as a pioneer whose work repeatedly precedes later technological realities, rather than framing her through contemporary hype. The interview prioritizes concrete artworks, exhibitions, and technical details to ground abstract discussions of identity, AI, and biotechnology. Rather than adopting a dystopian or celebratory tone, the piece maintains a critical but optimistic stance toward technology and human agency.

本文将林恩·赫舍曼·利森定位为“始终走在时代之前”的先驱,而非被当下技术热潮重新包装的艺术家。 通过具体作品、展览与技术细节,支撑关于身份、人工智能与生物技术的抽象讨论。 在警惕技术风险的同时,保持审慎而不失乐观的立场,强调人类能动性而非技术决定论。

Key questions

核心问题

  • How does her early work anticipate today’s questions of virtual identity and self-construction?
  • What happens when biotech becomes both medium and subject—DNA storage, antibodies, and profit-driven R&D?
  • How does art turn surveillance and “voyeurism” into a two-way system—and what risks remain invisible?
  • 她的早期实践如何预示当下虚拟身份与自我建构的问题?
  • 当生物技术既是媒介又是主题——DNA存储、抗体与利润驱动研发——会发生什么?
  • 艺术如何把监控与“偷窥”变成双向系统,而哪些风险依旧“看不见”?

Selected excerpts

节选

As one of the earliest and most influential media artists, Lynn Hershman Leeson has been exceptionally busy of late. Over the past four months, her solo exhibition Lynn Hershman Leeson: Anti-Bodies opened at Berlin’s KW Institute for Contemporary Art, where she also unveiled a new commissioned work, the Novalis Hotel, installed in KW’s public space at the Novalis Hotel—an expansion based on her iconic installation the Dante Hotel. In addition, she presented Lynn Hershman Leeson: First Person Plural at Basel’s House of Electronic Arts (HeK). At the same time, solo presentations of her work took place at ShanghART’s space in Singapore, Waldburger Wouters in Brussels, and Anglim Gilbert Gallery in San Francisco.

“As far back as I can remember, I’ve always been an artist.” Although trained with dual degrees in art and biology, Leeson insisted in her interview with The Art Newspaper China that, between the two, her identity as an artist comes first. With a mother who was a biologist and a family deeply rooted in the sciences, she loved making things with her hands from childhood. Over time, she fused her interest in science with artistic practice—an enduring core of her work as a 77-year-old artist—and went on to create many “firsts.”

作为最早也是最有影响力的媒体艺术家之一,林恩·赫舍曼·利森(Lynn Hershman Leeson)最近很忙。过去4个月里,她位于柏林的KW当代艺术研究院(KW Institute for Contemporary Art)的个展“抗体(Lynn Hershman Leeson: Anti-Bodies)”开幕,并在KW位于诺瓦利斯酒店的公共空间发布了新委托作品《诺瓦利斯酒店》(the Novalis Hotel),这件作品是基于她标志性装置《但丁酒店》(the Dante Hotel)创作的;此外,她还在巴塞尔“电子艺术之家”(House of Electronic Arts, HeK)举办了名为“第一人称复数(Lynn Hershman Leeson: First Person Plural)”的展览;同时,香格纳画廊位于新加坡的空间、布鲁塞尔Waldburger Wouters画廊和旧金山Anglim Gilbert画廊都举办了艺术家的个人展览。

“从我记事起,我就一直是一名艺术家。”虽然拥有着艺术和生物学双学位,但利森在接受《艺术新闻》采访时,始终坚持两者之间,艺术家的身份略胜一筹。由于母亲是生物学家,同时家人也都从事科学领域的工作,从儿时开始,利森便喜爱动手制作东西。逐渐地,利森将她对科学的兴趣与艺术创作结合起来,成为长期以来这位现年77岁的艺术家对艺术探索的核心,并创造了许多“第一”。

What this demonstrates

它能证明什么

  • Ability to report at the intersection of art, technology, and gender politics—grounded in specific works, mechanisms, and institutions.
  • Skill in translating technical concepts (AI agents, DNA as storage, biotech antibodies) into readable cultural narratives without hype.
  • Editorial judgment to frame a “pioneer” story with evidence: building a clear arc from biography → key works → contemporary stakes and risks.
  • 在“艺术×技术×性别政治”的交叉地带进行报道的能力,并能以具体作品、技术机制与机构语境落地。
  • 把 AI 代理、DNA 存储、生物制药抗体等技术议题转译为清晰可读的文化叙事,同时避免跟风式“技术神话”。
  • 以证据组织“先驱”叙事:从生平与创作脉络出发,串联代表作与当下风险/伦理议题,形成完整的编辑框架。